nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
AI智读

腾云AI智读

以下回复内容均依据本文提供!

AI导读
* 友情提示:该部分内容由 AI技术自动生成,仅供参考。对于因使用本网站以上内容产生的相关后果,本网站不承担任何商业和法律责任。
* 登录仅用于提升体验和增强功能,不会增加额外使用限制。
2024, 05, v.41;No.176 54-67
叶面喷施硅肥对沿海滩涂水稻茎秆形态、力学性状、抗倒伏能力和产量的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 江苏沿江地区农业科学研究所青年科技基金[YJ(2023)007]
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2024.05.009
发布时间: 2024-10-28
出版时间: 2024-10-28
移动端阅读
摘要:

为明晰喷施硅肥对沿海滩涂水稻茎秆形态、力学性状、抗倒伏能力和产量的影响,选取海洋院1号(V1)和南粳5055(V2)为试验材料,设置12种处理,即清水处理(CK)、矿源HA络合硅肥(T1)、糖醇硅肥(T2)、高活性离子态液体硅肥(T3)、液体硅锌肥(T4)、自制硅肥(T5),每种硅肥设置2个喷施模式:喷施2次,于分蘖期和拔节抽穗期施肥;喷施3次,前2次同前,第3次于灌浆期追加施肥。结果表明:1)喷施硅肥能降低水稻株高和节间长度,提高节间粗度、茎壁厚度和抗折力,进而提升茎秆抗倒伏能力,V1喷施T4和T5抗折力较大,倒伏指数较低,而V2喷施T3和T5显示抗倒伏能力较强,且2个品种均表现出喷施3次比2次效果好。2)喷施硅肥能显著提升水稻产量及其构成因素,与CK相比,V1喷施2次和3次T1,水稻产量增幅分别为3.02%、5.13%,T2产量增幅分别为5.05%、7.58%,T3产量增幅分别为2.03%、2.26%,T4产量增幅分别为6.20%、8.44%,T5产量增幅分别为4.88%、9.47%;V2喷施2次和3次T1,水稻产量增幅分别为8.57%、9.46%,T2产量增幅分别为3.48%、3.62%,T3产量增幅分别为6.08%、8.28%,T4产量增幅分别为4.02%、5.12%,T5产量增幅分别为2.97%、3.18%。产量增加主要由穗数和穗实粒数共同影响,其中穗实粒数影响较大;喷施3次比2次产量增幅提高,主要是在灌浆期喷施硅肥提高了千粒质量和结实率。3)喷施硅肥降低了水稻穗长并提高了着粒密度、单穴产量和生物量,V1喷施2次和3次T4的单穴产量最高,而V2表现出T1最高,且喷施3次效果优于2次,2个品种的收获指数均有小幅提升但无统计学意义。4)喷施硅肥对滩涂水稻一二次枝梗性状的影响因品种不同具有差异性,特别是提高了二次枝梗数、总粒数和实粒数,V1喷施T5效果较好,V2喷施T2肥效较高。综上,不同硅肥对不同品种水稻的促进效果存在差异,喷施T5对于二者提升抗倒伏能力效果均最好,同时使V1显著增产,而V2喷施T1增产效果最好。

Abstract:

The effects of foliar silicon fertilizer application on stem morphology, mechanical properties, lodging resistance and yield of rice in tidal flat were studied. Haiyangyuan No.1(V1) and Nangeng 5055(V2) were used as experimental materials, and 12 treatments were established,including clear water(CK), mineral HA complex silicon fertilizer(T1), sugar alcohol silicon fertilizer(T2), highly active ionic liquid silicon fertilizer(T3), liquid silicon zinc fertilizer(T4), and custom-made silicon fertilizer(T5). Each treatment had two models, involving two applications during the tillering and jointing-heading stages, and three applications during the tillering, jointing-heading, and grain filling stages. The results showed that: 1) Spraying silicon fertilizer can reduce rice plant height and internode length, improve internode roughness, stem wall thickness,and bending resistance, thereby enhancing stem lodging resistance. V1 treated with T4 and T5 has higher bending resistance and lower lodging index, while V2 treated with T3 and T5 on has stronger lodging resistance, and the effect of 3 applications was better than that of 2 applications.2) Spraying silicon fertilizer can significantly improve rice yield and its constituent factors. Compared with CK, V1 treated with twice and three times increased yield by 3.02% and 5.13%(T1), 5.05% and 7.58%(T2), 2.03% and 2.26%(T3), 6.20% and 8.44%(T4), and 4.88% and 9.47%(T5) respectively, while V2 treated with twice and three times increased yield by 8.57% and 9.46%(T1), 3.48% and 3.62%(T2), 6.08% and8.28%(T3), 4.02% and 5.12%(T4), and 2.97% and 3.18%(T5) respectively. The increase in yield was mainly due to the combined number of panicles and the number of grains per panicle, among which the number of grains per panicle had a greater effect. The increase of yield was higher after three times of spraying than that after two times of spraying, mainly due to the increase in thousand grain weight and seed setting rate caused by the application of silicon fertilizer during the filling period. 3) Spraying silicon fertilizer reduced rice panicle length and increased grain density, single plant yield, and biomass. V1 sprayed twice and three times with T4, resulting in the highest single plant yield, while V2 sprayed with T1 showed the highest, and the effect of spraying three times was better than twice. The harvest index of both varieties was slightly improved but did not reach a significant level. 4) The effect of spraying silicon fertilizer on the primary and secondary branch traits of rice in mudflat is different with different varieties, especially the number of secondary branches, total grains and full grains. V1 sprayed with T5 was better, V2 sprayed with T2 was better. In summary, there are differences in the promotion effects of different silicon fertilizers on different varieties of rice. Spraying T5 has the best effect on improving the lodging resistance of both varieties, and significantly increases the yield of Haiyangyuan No.1(V1). Nanjing 5055(V2) Sprayed with T1 has the best yield increasing effect.

参考文献

[1]李彬,王志春,孙志高,等.中国盐碱地资源与可持续利用研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(2):154-158.

[2] JULKOWSKA M M,TESTERINK C. Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2015,20(9):586-594.

[3]韩笑,卢磊.根际促生菌提高水稻对非生物胁迫耐受性的研究进展[J].生命科学,2019,31(3):289-295.

[4]朱建峰,崔振荣,吴春红,等.我国盐碱地绿化研究进展与展望[J].世界林业研究,2018,31(4):70-75.

[5]杨劲松.中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):837-845.

[6]王才林,张亚东,赵凌,等.耐盐碱水稻研究现状、问题与建议[J].中国稻米,2019,25(1):1-6.

[7]颜佳倩,顾逸彪,薛张逸,等.耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J].作物学报,2022,48(6):1463-1475.

[8]韦还和,张徐彬,葛佳琳,等.盐胁迫对水稻颖花形成及籽粒充实的影响[J].作物学报,2021,47(12):2471-2480.

[9]凌启鸿.盐碱地种稻有关问题的讨论[J].中国稻米,2018,24(4):1-2.

[10]王相平,杨劲松,姚荣江,等.苏北滩涂水稻微咸水灌溉模式及土壤盐分动态变化[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(7):54-63.

[11]严凯,蒋玉兰,唐纪元,等.盐碱地条件下施氮量和栽插密度对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2018(2):67-74.

[12]向镜,张义凯,朱德峰,等.盐碱地耕作和洗盐方式对水稻生长及产量的影响[J].中国稻米,2018,24(4):68-71.

[13] KANAWAPEE N,SANITCHON J,SRIHABAN P,et al.Physiological changes during development of rice(Oryza sativa L.)varieties differing in salt tolerance under saline field condition[J]. Plant and Soil,2013,370(1):89-101.

[14] ABBAS G,SAQIB M,AKHTAR J,et al. Physiological and biochemical characterization of Acacia stenophylla and Acacia albida exposed to salinity under hydroponic conditions[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2017,47(9):1293-1301.

[15]朱明霞,高显颖,邵玺文,等.不同浓度盐碱胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J].吉林农业科学,2014,39(6):12-16.

[16]罗成科,肖国举,张峰举,等.不同浓度复合盐胁迫对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(1):137-141.

[17]张蛟,翟彩娇,崔士友.微咸水灌溉滩涂稻田盐分动态及其水稻产量表现[J].江苏农业学报,2018,34(4):799-803.

[18] SHRIVASTAVA P,KUMAR R. Soil salinity:a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation[J]. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences,2015,22(2):123-131.

[19] NUMAN M,BASHIR S,KHAN Y,et al. Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants:a review[J]. Microbiological Research,2018,209:21-32.

[20]徐呈祥,刘兆普,刘友良.硅在植物中的生理功能[J].植物生理学通讯,2004(6):753-757.

[21] RODRIGUES F A′,VALE F X R,KORND·O·RFER G H,et al.Influence of silicon on sheath blight of rice in Brazil[J]. Crop Protection,2003,22(1):23-29.

[22] SEEBOLD K W,KUCHAREK T A,DATNOFF L E,et al. The influence of silicon on components of resistance to blast in susceptible, partially resistant, and resistant cultivars of rice[J].Phytopathology,2001,91(1):63-69.

[23] KLOTZB·U·CHER T,MARXEN A,JAHN R,et al. Silicon cycle in rice paddy fields:insights provided by relations between silicon forms in topsoils and plant silicon uptake[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2016,105(2):157-168.

[24]于成山.水稻施硅肥效果研究[J].辽宁农业职业技术学院学报,2016,18(2):3-4.

[25] TRIPATHI D K,SINGH V P,GANGWAR S,et al. Role of silicon in enrichment of plant nutrients and protection from biotic and abiotic stresses[M]//Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changes. New York:Springer,2013:39-56.

[26]曾仁杰.硅肥对水稻产量、品质及抗倒伏特性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(22):1-4.

[27]刘春成,李中阳,胡超,等.逆境条件下硅肥调控效应研究进展[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(4):337-346.

[28]罗来杨,吴晓峰,刘凯丽,等.硅肥对优质稻产量、品质及抗倒伏性的影响[J].杂交水稻,2023,38(2):149-153.

[29]吕烈武,郭玉莲,龙笛笛,等.海南岛典型水稻土施硅肥对水稻产量与品质的影响[J].热带作物学报,2024,45(1):87-96.

[30]李国辉,钟旭华,田卡,等.施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(7):1323-1334.

[31]金正勋,郑冠龙,朱立楠,等.不同氮钾肥施用方法对水稻产量及抗倒伏性的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2015,46(3):9-14.

[32]郭相平,黄双双,王振昌,等.不同灌溉模式对水稻抗倒伏能力影响的试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(5):1-5.

[33]赵建明,姜兴强,胡宁.水稻抗倒伏的材料学特性[J].北方水稻,2007,37(3):69-73.

[34]董明辉,张洪程,戴其根,等.不同粳稻品种倒伏指数及其相关农艺性状的分析[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(2):120-123.

[35]杨惠杰,杨仁崔,李义珍,等.水稻茎秆性状与抗倒性的关系[J].福建农业学报,2000,15(2):1-7.

[36]申广勒,石英尧,黄艳玲,等.水稻抗倒伏特性及其与茎秆性状的相关性研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(12):58-62.

[37]李红娇,张喜娟,李伟娟,等.超高产粳稻品种抗倒伏性的初步研究[J].北方水稻,2008,38(2):22-27.

[38]张忠旭,陈温福,杨振玉,等.水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1999,30(2):81-85.

[39]王秀凤,党立华,都华,等.水稻茎秆抗倒性构成因素的研究[J].北方水稻,2008,38(2):16-21,39.

[40]李杰,张洪程,龚金龙,等.不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(11):2234-2243.

[41]罗茂春,田翠婷,李晓娟,等.水稻茎秆形态结构特征和化学成分与抗倒伏关系综述[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(11):2346-2353.

[42]孙旭初.水稻茎秆抗倒性的研究[J].中国农业科学,1987,20(4):32-37.

[43]段传人,王伯初,王凭青.水稻茎秆的结构及其性能的相关性[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2003,26(11):38-40.

[44]刘红芳,宋阿琳,范分良,等.高供氮水平下不同硅肥对水稻茎秆特征的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(3):758-768.

[45]陈健晓,屠乃美,易镇邪,等.硅肥对超级早稻茎叶形态与抗倒伏特性的影响[J].作物研究,2011,25(3):209-212.

[46]徐宏书,高臣,刘俊渤,等.二氧化硅溶胶制剂对水稻增产的生理效应研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2010(2):59-62.

[47]郑英杰.盐胁迫对水稻的影响及水稻耐盐育种研究[J].北方水稻,2013,43(5):71-74,80.

[48]周根友,翟彩娇,邓先亮,等.盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2018,32(2):146-154.

[49]胡博文,谷娇娇,贾琰,等.盐胁迫对寒地粳稻籽粒淀粉形成积累及产量的影响[J].华北农学报,2019,34(1):115-123.

[50]韦海敏,陶伟科,周燕,等.硅素穗肥优化滨海盐碱地水稻矿质元素吸收分配提高耐盐性[J].作物学报,2023,49(5):1339-1349.

[51]龚金龙,胡雅杰,龙厚元,等.不同时期施硅对超级稻产量和硅素吸收、利用效率的影响[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(8):1475-1488.

[52]韩晓楠,孙书洪,马文慧,等.微咸水灌溉下硅肥对水稻生长性状的影响研究[J].节水灌溉,2022(1):74-79,84.

[53]何文丽,张玉烛,魏中伟.海水胁迫下外源硅对优质高产杂交稻产量及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2024,52(12):105-114.

[54]韦海敏,陶伟科,周燕,等.硅素穗肥优化滨海盐碱地水稻矿质元素吸收分配提高耐盐性[J].作物学报,2023,49(5):1339-1349.

基本信息:

DOI:10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2024.05.009

中图分类号:S511

引用信息:

[1]车飞伟,崔士友,陈澎军,等.叶面喷施硅肥对沿海滩涂水稻茎秆形态、力学性状、抗倒伏能力和产量的影响[J].大麦与谷类科学,2024,41(05):54-67.DOI:10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2024.05.009.

基金信息:

江苏沿江地区农业科学研究所青年科技基金[YJ(2023)007]

发布时间:

2024-10-28

出版时间:

2024-10-28

检 索 高级检索