nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
AI智读

腾云AI智读

以下回复内容均依据本文提供!

AI导读
* 友情提示:该部分内容由 AI技术自动生成,仅供参考。对于因使用本网站以上内容产生的相关后果,本网站不承担任何商业和法律责任。
* 登录仅用于提升体验和增强功能,不会增加额外使用限制。
您当前所在位置: 首页> 文献列表> 不同硫包膜缓释肥施用模式对红皮小麦产量及效益的影响
2023, 03, v.40;No.168 29-35
不同硫包膜缓释肥施用模式对红皮小麦产量及效益的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 江苏省农业科技自主创新项目[CX(21)3065];; 镇江市重点研发计划—现代农业项目(NY2021005)
邮箱(Email): 852235436@qq.com;363877339@qq.com;
DOI: CNKI:SUN:DMKX.0.2023-03-004
移动端阅读
摘要:

为了探究在减施增效的施肥目标下,不同硫包膜缓释肥施用模式对淮南麦区红皮小麦产量及效益的影响,选用镇麦15为试验材料,将硫包膜掺混肥(SCU)和普通尿素进行配施,设置1个不施肥对照(CK)和6种施肥模式(U、SR1、M1、SR2、M2和SR3),研究小麦产量及其构成因素、干物质积累、经济系数和经济效益对不同施肥模式的响应。结果表明:1)相同施氮量下,采用2次施肥的M1和SR2的产量较常规施肥U模式增幅分别达到13.00%和12.00%,而减氮条件下M2、SR3模式的增幅达到15.56%和10.09%,这主要得益于缓释肥促进小麦穗粒数的增加;2)M1、SR2和M2模式都具有相对较高的茎质量、叶质量、穗质量,但只有M2的经济系数最高,其经济效益也最高,达968.62元/667 m2,比常规施肥模式提高28.14%。总体上,M2模式在总施氮量减少15%的基础上增产增效显著。

Abstract:

In order to explore the effect of different fertilization patterns of sulfur coated slow-release fertilizer on the yield and economic benefits of red-skinned wheat in Huainan wheat area under the goal of reducing application and increasing efficiency,Zhenmai 15 was selected as the experimental material, and a non-fertilization control(CK) and six fertilization patterns(U, SR1, M1,SR2, M2 and SR3) were set up to study the response of wheat yield and its composition, dry matter accumulation, economic coefficient and economic benefits to different fertilization patterns. The results showed that under the same nitrogen application rate, the patterns M1 and SR2 with two times application achieved significantly higher yield, which increased by 13.00% and 12.00% respectively compared with that under the conventional fertilization pattern. Under the condition of nitrogen reduction, the pattern M2 and SR3increased yield by 15.56% and 10.09%. These patterns made the yield increase by increasing the numbers of grains per panicle. The patterns M1, SR2 and M2 all had relatively higher stem weight, leaf weight and panicle weight, but only the M2 pattern had the highest economic coefficient and economic benefit. The economic benefit of the M2 pattern reached 968.62 yuan/667 m2, which was 28.14%more than that of the conventional fertilization pattern. In general, the M2 pattern, with a 15% reduction in total nitrogen application,has a significant effect on increasing yield and efficiency.

参考文献

[1]赵俊晔,于振文.我国小麦生产现状与发展小麦生产能力的思考[J].农业现代化研究,2005,26(5):344-348.

[2]翟辰洋.推进江苏省现代种业高质量发展的路径探讨[J].中国种业,2021(2):3-6.

[3] TIAN H Q,LU C Q,MELILLO J,et al. Food benefit and climate warming potential of nitrogen fertilizer uses in China[J].Environmental Research Letters,2012,7(4):044020.

[4] ZHANG D,WANG H Y,PAN J T,et al. Nitrogen application rates need to be reduced for half of the rice paddy fields in China[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2018,265:8-14.

[5] NIE S W,ENEJI A E,CHEN Y Q,et al. Nitrate leaching from maize intercropping systems with N fertilizer over-dose[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2012,11(9):1555-1565.

[6] LIU H,WANG Z H,YU R,et al. Optimal nitrogen input for higher efficiency and lower environmental impacts of winter wheat production in China[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2016,224:1-11.

[7] WANG H Y,ZHANG D,ZHANG Y T,et al. Ammonia emissions from paddy fields are underestimated in China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2018,235:482-488.

[8]易琼,张秀芝,何萍,等.氮肥减施对稻-麦轮作体系作物氮素吸收、利用和土壤氮素平衡的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(5):1069-1077.

[9]程前,李广浩,陆卫平,等.增密减氮提高夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(6):1035-1046.

[10]牛轶男,申丹丹,丁永刚,等.减氮模式对稻茬中筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮肥效率的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2021,41(12):1524-1533.

[11]谭德水,林海涛,朱国梁,等.黄淮海东部冬小麦一次性施肥的产量效应[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(20):3887-3896.

[12]邓先亮,屠晓,李军,等.缓控释肥一次性基施对小麦产量及其形成的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019(3):87-93.

[13] KE J,XING X M,LI G H,et al. Effects of different controlledrelease nitrogen fertilisers on ammonia volatilisation,nitrogen use efficiency and yield of blanket-seedling machine-transplanted rice[J]. Field Crops Research,2017,205:147-156.

[14] SHAVIV A. Controlled release fertilizers[C]//IFA International Workshop on Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers,Frankfurt,Germany. Paris:International Fertilizer Industry Association,2005.

[15] KOCHBA M,GAMBASH S,AVNIMELECH Y. Studies on slow release fertilizers:1.Effects of temperature,soil moisture,and water vapor pressure[J]. Soil Science,1990,149(6):339-343.

[16] DEVASSINE M,HENRY F,GUERIN P,et al. Coating of fertilizers by degradable polymers[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics,2002,242(1/2):399-404.

[17]程冬冬,窦午红,赵贵哲,等.高分子缓/控释肥氮磷养分释放特征及影响因素研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(3):484-492.

[18]杨斌华,郭桂珍,孙友谊,等.细菌微生物对高分子缓控释化肥降解性能的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(9):5278-5280.

[19]马泉,唐紫妍,王梦尧,等.树脂包膜缓释肥与尿素配施对稻茬冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率与效益的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2019,39(10):1202-1210.

[20]李亮,陈宗金,蔚大青,等.控释尿素追施量对冬小麦产量及氮肥偏生产力的影响[J].山东农业科学,2019,51(7):55-59.

[21]刘苹,李庆凯,林海涛,等.不同缓控释肥对小麦产量、氮素吸收及氮肥利用率的影响[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(2):70-74.

[22]顾颖慧,刘虹丹,刘文成,等.硫包衣缓释肥施用方式调控红皮强筋小麦产量、品质及氮效率的特征分析[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(9):2382-2390.

[23] NI B L,LIU M Z, LüS Y,et al. Novel slow-release multielement compound fertilizer with hydroscopicity and moisture preservation[J]. Industrial&Engineering Chemistry Research,2010,49(10):4546-4552.

[24]马泉,王亚华,王梦尧,等.缓控释肥的发展应用与评价体系研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(18):24-29.

[25] SUN Y,MI W H,SU L J,et al. Controlled-release fertilizer enhances rice grain yield and N recovery efficiency in continuous non-flooding plastic film mulching cultivation system[J]. Field Crops Research,2019,231:122-129.

[26]邢晓鸣,李小春,丁艳锋,等.缓控释肥组配对机插常规粳稻群体物质生产和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(24):4892-4902.

[27]李敏,郭熙盛,叶舒娅,等.树脂膜控释尿素及普通尿素配施对强筋小麦产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2013,33(2):339-343.

[28]曲均峰,王国忠,傅送保.脲醛缓释肥对小麦产量及经济效益的影响[J].化肥工业,2016,43(4):93-94,96.

[29]汪强,李双凌,韩燕来,等.缓/控释肥对小麦增产与提高氮肥利用率的效果研究[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4):693-696.

[30]符建荣.控释氮肥对水稻的增产效应及提高肥料利用率的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(2):145-152.

[31]孔丽婷,蒋桂英,杨灵威.减量施氮对滴灌春小麦干物质和氮素积累转运特征的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2021,41(3):317-327.

[32] ERCOLI L,LULLI L,MARIOTTI M,et al. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2008,28(2):138-147.

[33] ZEIDAN M S,EL KRAMANY M F. Effect of organic manure and slow-release N-fertilizers on the productivity of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)in sandy soil[J]. Acta Agronomica Hungarica,2001,49(4):379-385.

[34]杨军芳,黄少辉,邢素丽,等.脲甲醛缓释肥在冬小麦上的肥料效应研究[J].河北农业科学,2017,21(5):47-52.

[35] LI G Q,YANG J T,YAN L Y,et al. The effects of controlled release fertilizer and conventional complex fertilizer on the dry matter accumulation and the yield in winter wheat[J]. Research Journal of Applied Sciences,Engineering and Technology,2013,5(9):2724-2728.

[36] VEJAN P,KHADIRAN T,ABDULLAH R,et al. Controlled release fertilizer:a review on developments,applications and potential in agriculture[J]. Journal of Controlled Release,2021,339:321-334.

[37]方文英,梁金根,庞法松,等.小麦扬麦24施用缓释肥的效果[J].浙江农业科学,2017,58(2):244-245.

基本信息:

DOI:CNKI:SUN:DMKX.0.2023-03-004

中图分类号:S512.1

引用信息:

[1]邓垚,孔强,郭瑞,等.不同硫包膜缓释肥施用模式对红皮小麦产量及效益的影响[J].大麦与谷类科学,2023,40(03):29-35.DOI:CNKI:SUN:DMKX.0.2023-03-004.

基金信息:

江苏省农业科技自主创新项目[CX(21)3065];; 镇江市重点研发计划—现代农业项目(NY2021005)

检 索 高级检索