| 131 | 0 | 203 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为优化鲜食糯玉米的工厂化育苗技术,筛选适宜的育苗基质,以苏玉糯11和苏玉糯818为供试鲜食糯玉米品种,对三益农业基质(T1)、寿光恒先基质(T2)、大汉沃松基质(T3)栽培下糯玉米幼苗长势、根系和地上部干物质积累及根冠比等指标进行分析。结果表明,不同基质对鲜食糯玉米幼苗的影响不同,其中寿光恒先基质(T2)显著提升了2个糯玉米品种的地上部生长指标,平均株高较T1和T3处理分别高1.9%和4.0%,叶面积也分别增加4.9%和11.5%。而大汉沃松基质(T3)处理下2个品种的平均根系鲜质量较T1和T2分别提高57.1%和6.9%,干质量分别提升112.9%和71.6%,根冠比分别显著增加123.9%和96.3%。因此,在鲜食玉米工厂化育苗生产中可优先选择大汉沃松基质。
Abstract:In order to optimize the industrialized seedling technology of fresh waxy corn and screen suitable seedling cultivation substrates, taking Suyunuo 11 and Suyunuo 818 as test varieties, this study analyzed the growth, dry matter accumulation of roots and aboveground, and the root-shoot ratio under Sanyi Nongye substrate(T1), Shouguang Hengxian substrate(T2) and Dahan Wosong substrate(T3). The results showed that different substrates had different effects on the seedlings of fresh waxy corn. Specifically, the Shouguang Hengxian substrate(T2) was superior to other substrates in improving the aboveground growth indexes of both varieties. For instance, the average plant height under T2 was 1.9% and 4.0% higher than that under T1 and T3 treatments, respectively, and the leaf area increased by 4.9% and 11.5%, while the Dahan Wosong substrate(T3) significantly increased root fresh weight by 57.1% and 6.9%,root dry weight by 112.9% and 71.6%, and root-shoot ratio by 123.9% and 96.3% compared to T1 and T2, respectively. Based on these findings, it is recommended to prioritize the Dasen Wosong substrate(T3) in the industrial seedling production of fresh waxy corn.
[1]徐丽,赵久然,卢柏山,等.我国鲜食玉米种业现状及发展趋势[J].中国种业,2020(10):14-18.
[2]宋旭东,喻俊杰,张振良,等.江苏省鲜食糯玉米优质高效生产技术[J].大麦与谷类科学,2022,39(6):55-59.
[3]陈舜权,胡俏强,潘玖琴,等.江苏省鲜食玉米产业现状及发展对策[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(32):320-321,331.
[4]王慧,卢有林,沈革志,等.鲜食糯玉米淀粉RVA谱特征值分析及其与主要品质性状相关性研究[J].玉米科学,2011,19(4):98-102,107.
[5]姚霄宇,邱纹,陆虎华,等.种植密度和施肥方式对春播鲜食糯玉米产量、品质及氮素吸收利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2023,29(12):2258-2271.
[6]陈召玲.鲜食玉米大棚穴盘育苗栽培技术[J].中国农机装备,2024(4):16-18.
[7]丁检,孙彩霞,金炳胜,等.蔬菜工厂化育苗关键技术[J].长江蔬菜,2024(6):6-9.
[8]郭炜,于洪久,李玉梅,等.不同育苗基质对玉米幼苗素质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012(4):71-73.
[9]吕佳雯,李文霞,李凯,等.穴盘穴数对玉米工厂化育苗效果的影响[J].中国种业,2018(4):58-60.
[10]颜秋艳,曾亮华,赖丽娟,等.工厂化育苗生产线填土装置的设计研究[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(4):322-323,344.
[11]吕赢,王宇微,王越,等.黄瓜穴盘育苗不同配比基质筛选试验[J].长江蔬菜,2023(24):7-10..
[12]陈家秀,陈林.不同商品基质对辣椒育苗的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2024(24):10-13.
[13]柴文臣.工厂化育苗基质配比及生长调节剂对番茄苗期生长的影响[D].太原:山西农业大学,2017:5-12.
[14]胡留杰,聂明,杭晓宁,等.育苗基质不同配方对糯玉米幼苗生长的影响[J].南方农业,2018,12(34):71-74.
[15]王林闯,许文钊,徐兵划,等.不同类型育苗基质对无籽西瓜出苗及生长的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2019,47(4):69-70,78.
[16]梁赛英.不同基质配比对辣椒穴盘育苗的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2022,50(2):48-51.
[17]刘俊峰,孔亮亮,宋俏姮,等.四川冬季设施鲜食玉米高产栽培技术探讨[J].安徽农学通报,2021,27(19):23-24.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2025.04.003
中图分类号:S513
引用信息:
[1]徐琳雅,冒宇翔,戴其燕,等.育苗基质对鲜食糯玉米幼苗生长的影响[J].大麦与谷类科学,2025,42(04):16-21.DOI:10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2025.04.003.
基金信息:
江苏省农业科技自主创新项目[CX(23)1043]; 江苏省现代农机装备与技术示范推广项目(NJ2023-05)
2025-08-01
2025-08-01
2025-08-01